DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29848>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29848 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-04 15:44 ------- Strictly speaking you are right, a validation error is not a syntax error, but I don't think that such a narrow definition is the intent of the specification. More likely in my opinion is that 400 is ment to be similar to 500, except for user rather than server errors. In any case, my point is that returning 200 even though there was an error doesn't seem like a very good practice. If you are accessing the web interface programmatically (think REST), you won't know that your input was invalid until your parser crashes - if you are lucky. Come to think of it, I bet you can find plenty of pages that contain nothing but an error message, but were happily indexed by Google (which does not yet understand English very well :-) Of course I can work around this, as Don Brown suggests, but I think it would be great if the framework returned appropriate status codes by default, as few people have time to care about such issues. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
