DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35839>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35839 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-13 11:07 ------- (In reply to comment #15) [snip] > I do object to one particular technical detail -- I do not like the "IXXX" > convention (which Tapestry, among other projects, uses) for interfaces. > That's inconsistent with coding conventions throughout the rest of Shale. I will fix that. [snip] > > AFAIK there is one incompatibility to the current parser. All tags with > > a jsfid (implicit or explicit) that are not ignored must be well formed. > > > > Does the Tapestry parser have the same sort of restriction (for jwcid)? If > so, it's not a fatal flaw IMHO (essentially, JSP imposes the same restriction > on custom tag elements), but I'm curious. Yes, but I could fix that for tags that must not have an ending tag (e.g. input). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
