DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36659>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36659





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-16 09:44 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > (In reply to comment #1)
> ..
> > For this issue, the underlying problem is that your LoadBundle 
> > implementation
> > doesn't make the messages available at component creation time.
> 
> That's true.  This component should come with a disclaimer.  I added a note 
> in 
> the javadoc that warned against the rendered attribute stating that the 
> component is not immune to the rendered property like the JSP loadBundle tag.
> 
> I suspect that that's why the JSF loadBundle is implemented as a JSP tag and 
> doesn't have a corresponding JSF component.  
> 
> I don't think that we can play by the same rules.  But maybe a solution would 
> be to create a handler that could be associated to a meta-component 
> definition 
> that has callback methods similar to the shale view controller or the tiles 
> controller.  It could be added to the component metadata and fired by the 
> chain used to build the component tree?
> 
> <component preCreate=”#{managed-bean-name.preCreate} postCreate=”#{managed-
> bean-name.postCreate} ”….>

Or use the patch from bug #35935.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to