I got the impression that the book, itself, was incomplete and
unfinished.  Admittedly, I did not spend 10 minutes on it, as you did.
You comments may lead me to give it a second look.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:29 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Cc: dev@struts.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsBook" by 
> GeorgeDinwiddie
> 
> 
> I'm not sure I'm ready to endorse in writing and in public :)
> 
> I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on the 
> "incomplete feeling" it gave you... I actually got just the 
> opposite impression, that it touched on a great many relevant 
> things.  Perhaps because it was admittedly shallow 
> detail-wise in spots?  The language issues I tend to gloss 
> over because even store-bought books these days tend to have 
> far more grammatical/careless errors than they should... how 
> many errata does a typical tech book these days have?!?
> 
> I think for the target audience I forwarded it to here at 
> work, it's very good... they just need to be made aware of a 
> great many things and have a clue about them, not become 
> instant experts in them.  For those of us with more 
> experience, we aren't likely to get much, if anything, out of 
> it... although I have to say, I've seen a great many 
> piss-poor attempts of explaining Tiles, but the brief few 
> paragraphs in this about it was very clear, concise and 
> understandable.
> 
> -- 
> Frank W. Zammetti
> Founder and Chief Software Architect
> Omnytex Technologies
> http://www.omnytex.com
> AIM: fzammetti
> Yahoo: fzammetti
> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> On Tue, November 15, 2005 1:13 pm, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > It might be worthwhile to add your review (below) to the wiki page 
> > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsBook  I, for one, was 
> put off by 
> > the language errors and general incomplete feeling of the document, 
> > but your comments would lead me to give it a closer look.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:08 PM
> >> To: Struts Developers List
> >> Cc: Struts Developers List
> >> Subject: Re: Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsBook" by 
> >> GeorgeDinwiddie
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, November 15, 2005 12:53 pm, Martin Cooper said:
> >> > Very strange. The title says Struts Ti, but that is the
> >> only place in
> >> > the entire book that Ti is mentioned.
> >>
> >> I thought that was odd too :)
> >>
> >> I have to say, I spent about 10 minutes looking over this 
> thing, and 
> >> overall I thought it was quite good.  Sure, there are some 
> debatable 
> >> points in there, some things that some might argue aren't "best 
> >> practices", and there are some mistakes like you've 
> pointed out (no 
> >> more than most books that get published today I'd bet), 
> but it looks 
> >> to do a good job of covering a lot of topics in a decent way.  I've
> >> actually passed a copy along to some colleagues that are just
> >> getting into the J2EE web development world now... I think if
> >> they read and understand even half of this it will serve them
> >> down the road.
> >>
> >> > My
> >> > favourite, though, is page 3, where is says "This book
> >> should be used
> >> > by". (That's the entire sentence.)
> >>
> >> Hey, that's flexibility man! :)
> >>
> >> Frank
> >>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to