Ted proposed before that we collect them into a "wish list" type of page on the wiki. I don't know if it still makes sense now if we'll be adopting WW anyway. If it does, though, we could start with http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5739, maybe devote one section (or page) to it, to keep track of specific instances that need attention, and get them checked off one by one.
Hubert On 11/30/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally, I agree, although I know there are those that see them still as a > valuable source of ideas. By emphasizing Milestones, though, they will fade > into the background. > > I'd be in favor of a "Probably Never" resolution though :) > > Don > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On 11/30/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>JIRA is already on Apache servers. > >> > >>But back to the topic, what do folks think of the proposal to target > >>tickets to > >>milestones and use them for release planning? I think we should start > >>immediately by creating upcoming milestones, and going through all our old > >>tickets and assigning them to the new milestones. This would go a long way > >>to > >>folks wondering what exactly was in 1.3.0. > > > > > > +1, but what we could probably do with is closing down tickets that > > have been open too long and are never going to be realistically done - > > can we have a "Probably Never" target? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
