Gary VanMatre wrote:
From: Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ok but I still don't get it. From what I understand, you couldn't not
use for example @a or
@ab because they share the first same letter. That what I found when I
took a quick look in the sources but I could be wrong. And since
symbols are inherited that's not a lot. I guess I am probably not
getting something here.
No, you have a very good point and I didn't mean to seem as if I'm discounting it. It is a limitation but my opinion is that you can come up with a easy conventions for making unique names.
Consider @[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is valid using the current substitution mechanism. (I just realized this myself :-).
I just posted a comment on the bug which suggested the equivalent (I
suggested @[EMAIL PROTECTED], similar to shell variable substitution, but it's
the same difference). Looks like the problem's already addressed :-)
L.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]