I'm not sure this is a good idea.
By agreeing on one or the other (or one that hasn't even been
mentioned yet), are we not setting ourselves up for future troll
attacks? Based on history, there is a high probability that dormant
trolls will come out of the woodwork with little more to say than
"you need to put [foo] in the subject line, if you don't believe me
you can ask Ted!!"
Your thoughts?
--
James Mitchell
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
Skype: jmitchtx
On Jan 10, 2006, at 6:30 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
On 1/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Struts Action Framework.
I figured that out.
Is that what Struts is now being called?
That is what the original framework growing out of Struts 1.x
code is now being called ... see the Struts website home page
for more info.
I read the discussions on what to call the framework formerly
known as
Struts. I understand what "Struts Action Framework" is. I was just
surprised to see it reduced to "SAF". I'm just a bystander, but I
think
that's a mistake, if you want Struts Action to retain any
mindshare in
the developer community.
In the interest of effective filtering, we should agree on a standard
subject tag for the Struts Action framework. For the Struts Shale
framework, we've been using [Shale]. So, for the other, should we use
* [SAF 2.x]
or
* [Action 2.x]
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
