Yes, Matthew, you're right, my choce of words is unfortunate. We discussed the idea of Contigix submitting a Repsonse to the RFP, but the discussions broke down when we realized that there would not be a good match.
Since you've opened the door, I'll post the last exchange I have on the thread. If there was another message after that, I did not receive it, or it was mis-filtered somehow. We continue to be very grateful to Contegix for their help with the OpenSource site that powers the iBATIS and Geronimo wikis, along with the Roller issue tracker, among many, many other projects. -Ted. On 12/7/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We would be interested in seeing the Contegrix response, but hosting > through another data center might be a harder sell. All we really know > at this point, is that what we are doing now isn't going to work > indefinately. The easiest thing would be if someone could run with > what we have, so that's what we expressed in the RFP. But, in the > end, that might not be a practical option, and so we might need to > consider alternatives. > > -Ted. > > On 12/7/05, Matthew E. Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ted: > > I am still preparing a response but want to give you an update. > > While we would absolutely *love* to help ASF and earn their business, > > I am not sure if Contegix is the right fit. All of our hosting is in > > our data center. It looks like the proposal is for a full-time > > person to travel to colocation facilities around the globe. > > > > Do you think this would be something ASF is interested in at all? > > > > > > Cheers, > > Matthew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
