On 1/26/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/24/06, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - add a Cancelable interface which an Action must implement to get > > cancel processing; ignore the cancel param if the interface isn't > > implemented > > I'd lean toward the interface approach, since that's the sort of thing > that WW2/Action2 does/will do. Duty now for the future!
If the plan is to design for ww/action2, then more thought needs to go into the interface design - whether its simply a marker interface or includes some behaviour (e.g. a cancel() method) since getting it wrong is going to both be a pain for Struts 1.x and a legacy burden for Action 2. Its probably worth consulting the ww developers on whether they think its desirable to have this feature and the best way to implement it in ww/action2. Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
