> Definitely interesting. There are some overlaps with what Shale does, > especially in the Shale Tiger Extensions[1] feature that lets you use > annotations to register components/converters/validators, define view > controllers, and declare managed beans.
Right! That was what I was thinking first. But IMHO I like more the Shale way, since you don't need no interface or superclass. > You will notice that annotated navigation is not on that list ... and Really ? I have to search my older struts dev email. I am thinking, I have seen something like that in this list. -Matthias > philosophically I believe that navigation should *not* be configured that > way. But it is certainly something that could be accomplished technically. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > [1] - http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/12/integrating-jsf-beehive.html > > > Craig > > [1] http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/features-tiger-extensions.html > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
