Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by ongoing text:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ongoing_text

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
- [  What could be the problem with an exchange via text?
+ [  What could be the problem with our encounter on a text?
  It could be too fix; it could be exactly what we don’t want our project to 
become. Let’s avoid the division in Concept and Process and let’s edit it 
as a wave of thoughts between you and me. We already have so much in our 
interstice. Let’s just show it as a flux or a flow.
  That’s the only way not to loose all the precious inputs we gave the 
project. We arrived from different ways and keep the diversity in order to 
enrich the organic structure and make our reciprocal activation not a simply 
death end.
  Let’s edit a text divided just by spaces and let’s forget the titles. 
Let’s edit a text that progress in all the interesting direction that we have 
already activated.
  The text is an object and the medium of writing has implications on how we 
think and on how ideas are produced. In order to this the text is one of the 
objects produced but not the only or final one. In order to develop what and 
how we think we have to find different approaches to every point we make. In 
this case the text is an ongoing dialogue, it is a process that not only goes 
forwards but also backwards, to the left and to the right, up and down and 
somewhere else. There will be questions and some answers, but also not fully 
expressed ideas. These aspects can continually be rewritten, completed or even 
erased ]
  
- 
  [  I’m writing on confusion as a higher level of sensibility, Edward Lorenz 
and the Butterfly Effect  ]
- 
  
  [  There is a postcard with a still from the Wim Wender’s movie Alice in 
the Cities. On an unclear scene it is possible to detect the blond hair and the 
hint of a child’s body on the left side of the picture and a shadowed man’s 
figure on the right.
  I keep thinking about that space, that in between Rudiger Vogler and Yella 
Rottlander – the main character of the movie as well as the two entities on 
the postcards. With its absence, its endless possibilities of been fulfilled 
and its consequent productive confusion, this space simply embodies all the 
meaning of that human relation and, consequently, of the whole movie.
  It is on that unclear but still meaningful interstice that the concept of 
confusion as an extreme disorder seams to change value and reach a complex and 
productive signification. It’s in this alternative place that confusion could 
be seen as higher level of sensibility  ]
  
- 
- [  I’m writing a text on art as object in relation to history of art and in 
contrast with the idea of a window on the world  ]
+ [  I’m writing a text on art as object in relation to history of art and in 
contrast with the idea of a window on the world  ].
- 
  
  [  “The text doesn’t gloss the images, which do not illustrate the text. 
For me, each has been no more than the onset of a kind of visual uncertainty, 
analogous to that loss of meaning Zen calls a satori. Text and images, 
interlacing, seek to ensure the circulation and exchange of those signifiers: 
body, face, writing; and in than to read the retreat of signs”.
  
@@ -34, +30 @@

  
  It’s curious how he explains his first contact with the Japanese’ 
language in everyday life. The confusion brought by an unknown language, 
unknown sign and unknown rumours, together with the efforts to understand the 
language throw the person – a stranger without any knowledge of the idiom – 
in an alternative place: it’s in that alternative place that we can talk 
about a higher level of sensibility. Confusion is something that puts the 
person inside the in between, in the interstice where everything happens and 
where a productive dangerous zones is created ]
  
- 
  [  I’m writing on the Centre of Tokyo as a supreme interstice  ]
  
- 
- [  There is a poetry from Fernando Pessoa namely The King of Interstice that 
could be seen as a strong reference for our project:
+ [  There is a poetry from Fernando Pessoa namely The King of Interstice that 
could be seen as a strong reference for our project.:
  
  There lived, I know not when, never perhaps –
  But the fact is that he lived – an unknown king
@@ -61, +55 @@

  All think that he is God, except himself.
  
  That kingdom is the field of creation, the alternative place where it’s 
possible to detect a dangerous zone of thoughts.
- That kingdom is the place of interests of an organic structure, is one of the 
hubs, one of the meanings’ connector].
+ That kingdom is the place of interests of an organic structure, is one of the 
hubs, one of the meanings’ connector   ]
- 
  
  [  I’m writing a text on Hakim Bey and his idea of the no-go zone
  Hakim Bey is an avant-garde poet-philosopher whose work departs from the 
academic tradition, rediscovering mystery and magic as means of re-conquering 
joy of life and defeating boredom.
  About chaos:
  ‘CHAOS NEVER DIED. Primordial uncared block, sole worshipful monster, inert 
& spontaneous, more ultraviolet than any mythology (like the shadows before 
Babylon), the original undifferentiated oneness-of-being still radiates serene 
as the black pennants of Assassins, random & perpetually intoxicated.
- Chaos comes before all principles of order & entropy, it's neither a god nor 
a maggot, its idiotic desires encompass & define every possible choreography, 
all meaningless aethers & phlogistons: its masks are crystallizations of its 
own facelessness, like clouds. Everything in nature is perfectly real including 
consciousness, there's absolutely nothing to worry about. Not only have the 
chains of the Law been broken, they never existed; demons never guarded the 
stars, the Empire never got started, Eros never grew a beard’  ]
+ Chaos comes before all principles of order & entropy, it's neither a god nor 
a maggot, its idiotic desires encompass & define every possible choreography, 
all meaningless aethers & phlogistons: its masks are crystallizations of its 
own facelessness, like clouds. Everything in nature is perfectly real including 
consciousness, there's absolutely nothing to worry about. Not only have the 
chains of the Law been broken, they never existed; demons never guarded the 
stars, the Empire never got started, Eros never grew a beard’.  ]
  
- 
- [   I’m writing a text on the idea of laboratory related to curating 
showing the differences within   organisations  ]
+ [   I’m writing a text on the idea of laboratory related to curating 
showing the differences within organisations   ]
- 
  
  [   The project considered as a tautology brings us to Wittgenstein.
  For Wittgenstein tautology is a key point to understand the structure of 
language and as a consequence the structure of reality. Tautology could be 
considered as an interstice: it’s exactly nothing and everything at the same 
time, emptiness becomes fullness and the way around. As Wittgenstein says: 
‘tautology and contradiction are the limited cases of a language […] of the 
combination of senses that form reality’.
@@ -80, +71 @@

  For Wittgenstein tautology is a complete emptiness that at the same time is 
necessary to build an atomic and philosophical structure.
  When we take the idea of Tautology and emptiness to its extreme consequent 
then the interstice or meaningful emptiness stands at the basis of the 
understanding of reality and reality itself. According to this the emptiness 
can be considered as an alternative place where confusion could be seen as a 
higher level of sensibility and where production takes place. Ones erased the 
atomic approach the interstice remains. It is the place of creation and meaning 
   ]
  
- 
  [   I’m writing on the loss of control related to the position of the 
curator  ]
  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to