DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38343>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38343 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-08 06:50 ------- (In reply to comment #27) > 2) The JavaDoc reads in regards to not finding a match: "null is returned > which means the unspecified method will be invoked." I believe you have > changed the functionality so null is no longer returned, which > means "unspecified" is no longer invoked. Can you confirm this? I've removed the "incorrect" check from getMethodName (it no longer throws an exception if the method is null) and implemented the "unspecified" method to log/throw an exception which doesn't expose the mapping's parameter. Thanks for spotting this. Also when I looked at it, the getParameter() method was unecessary - I modified your version to throw an exception if the parameter was missing - but the inherited versions of this method were already doing that. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384133&view=rev http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384134&view=rev Thanks Paul. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
