On 3/12/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > md5's and pgp's all pan out. Not sure if it's necessary to sign the > > md5 files by the way. > > Not necessary at this stage while its just a "test build" - but if it > becomes an official release, my understanding is that every file in > the official "mirrored" dist needs to be signed. I've been asked by > someone at ASF (can't remember his name, but he has a webpage showing > offenders somewhere) in the past to sign these for previous releases.
That'll be henkp - he's the keeper of the ASF PGP vision. I'll ask him if he envisions .md5's being signed. > > Anyway, only real bad thing would be the failed ant build from the source. > > Thanks for the feedback. We can put a note in the "upgrade notes" on > the wiki if/when 1.2.9 goes "GA" to indicate how the build issue can > be resolved. Sounds good. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
