Is the lack of votes caused by someone voting against it, or because of non-responsiveness from the PMC members? If's it the latter, can't we prod them for one?
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This version has received the following votes to date: > > Don Brown voted for "GA" quality (binding) > Frank Zammetti voted for "GA" quality (non-binding) > Niall Pemberton voted for "GA" quality (binding) > > Unfortunately it has failed to receive the minimum of three PMC member votes > and therefore this version remains a "test build" at the moment and does not > become an official Apache release. > > Niall > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 11:10 PM > > > > The Struts 1.2.9 test build has been available for a week now. Once you > have > > had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please > respond > > to the following vote. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.9 build should be classified as: > > > > [ ] Alpha > > [ ] Beta > > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > If you are voting for Alpha or Beta, please state your concerns with the > > build as it is today. > > > > Only the votes of Struts PMC members are binding, however we value the > > opinions of the Struts community and welcome non PMC member votes. > > > > -- > > Niall Pemberton > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
