On 3/21/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/21/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387707&view=rev > > > Are you not seeing the javadocs (as well as the sources) for the sample > apps > > in the main (shale-framework-xxxxx.{tar.gz,zip}) artifacts? The intent > was > > that just the binaries for the sample apps would be packaged into the > > separate war files. I agree that the heading ("Source code and > JavaDocs") > > should just say "JavaDocs" but all the links work for me. > > What part of the commit are you questioning? All the links work for me, > too. > > The only link I removed (in the commit before this) is the "Example > applications" link that used to point at the nonexistent "../webapps" > directory. > > Then I moved the list of example apps down to another section, and > added your descriptions of shale-starter and shale-dependencies.
Can I blame the cat that was on my lap, demanding attention, for not scrolling through the entire thing? :-). I missed the fact that it was a move of the javadoc links, not just a delete. (The diff shows the list of Javadocs being moved up the page, instead > of the list of example apps being moved down.) > > Thanks, > -- > Wendy Craig
