+1 (non binding) for Alpha On 3/23/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for Alpha as well. Outside of the one known issue with the sql-browser > application, it looks good. Nice work Wendy. > > Gary > > -------------- Original message -------------- > From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > After correcting packaging problems with the Shale 1.0.1 test build, > > and following the release plan which is available on the Wiki, > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102 > > > > the Struts Shale v1.0.2 test build has been completed and deployed to > > > > http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/ > > > > including checksums and signatures, which may be verified against > > http://www.apache.org/dist/struts/KEYS . > > > > Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond > > with a vote on its quality: > > > > [ ] Alpha > > [ ] Beta > > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > > > We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes > > of Struts PMC members are binding. > > > > My vote is for Alpha quality, due to Shale's dependence on a snapshot > > of Standalone Tiles. > > > > -- > > Wendy Smoak > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
