On 3/27/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry for the late vote - my vote is for "alpha" quality as well, mainly > for > the same "standalone tiles is not released" reason cited by others, but > also > because of the way Commons Validator has been implemented. It appears that > the implementation was done based on an old version of validator where the > javascript was embedded in the XML config file. This means that 1) > maintenance of that javascript is the responsibility of Shale and 2) > upgrading to later versions of validator (such as the 1.3.0 version just > released) won't pick up bugfixes in the javascript as users would expect. > Is > there any objection to changing Shale to use the javascript from Commons > Validator?
+1 ... could you file an RFE so we can implement this and track it for the release notes on the next version? (I also plan on reviewing the other dependencies ... for example, MyFaces should be shipping 1.1.2 any day now, and it has a fix for the bug that prevents SQL Browser from actually displaying data.) Niall Craig ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:13 AM > > > The vote results are as follows: > > Binding PMC Member votes: > Wendy Smoak - Alpha > Gary VanMatre - Alpha > Craig McClanahan - Alpha > > Non-binding: > Sean Schofield - Alpha > > Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" quality. > > Craig, as far as I can tell, there was never an announcement for Shale > 1.0.0, and it isn't in www.apache.org/dist/struts. What would you > like to see happen with this one? > > At this point, my only distribution plans are to put the test > framework jar on ibiblio (via www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository) so > that MyFaces can use it for their release. > > Thanks, > -- > Wendy > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
