Ted Husted wrote:
We might want to keep a straight-line mapping in the naming conventions, where
OpenSymphony -> Apache Struts
WebWork -> Action
A good reason to prefer "action-default.xml" to "struts-default.xml"
is that we want people to be able to use Struts Action 1 and Struts
Action 2 in the same application space. We already have a
"struts-config.xml". While these file names don't actually conflict,
it might be clearer to name the new configurations "action" rather
than "struts" to avoid confusion.
So, I would suggest that we use "action-default.xml", and any place
where we've started to say "struts", we might consider saying
"action", so as to avoid confusion and conflict with Struts Action 1.
+1 struts-action.xml
--
Peter Pilgrim ( Windows XP / Thunderbird 1.5 )
__ _____ _____ _____
/ //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside Java
/ /___/ // /__ / /__ + Struts
/ // ___// ___// ___/ + Expresso Committer
__/ // /__ / /__ / /__ + Independent Contractor
/___//____//____//____/ + Intrinsic Motivation
On Line Resume
||
\\===> `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html ''
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
