On 4/24/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 10:34 AM -0700 4/24/06, Bob Lee wrote: > >I'm not sure two major releases is what's best for users. > > > >- If SAF2 is going to be the same as WW2, why have it at all? I think > >it will confuse users unnecessarily. > >- We'll be stuck supporting WW2, SAF2, and SAF3 instead of just WW2 and > SAF2. > >- Some users will migrate to SAF2 and then will have to migrate again to > SAF3. > >- People will think we're incompetent and disorganized and that we > >care more about playing than supporting users based on the fact that > >we completely redesigned our framework twice in such a short period of > >time (SAF1 -> SAF2 -> SAF3). > > > >I think we're overestimating the amount of effort it will take to do > >this right. Designing a clean API that we can support for the next 5 > >years should be our #1 priority. We can do a minimal amount of work on > >the implementation so we can release ASAP and clean it up later. > > I'm inclined to agree with Bob here. At this point, I think that the > first release of SAF2 should be taking the stage as more than just > WebWork 2.x with renamed packages. It doesn't need to be radically > different, but it should be more than that.
+1 -- Martin Cooper Joe > > -- > Joe Germuska > [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com > > "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and > even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new." > -- Robert Moog > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
