+1 to that.

Bob

On 4/24/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > I think a better strategy would be to have the core framework depend solely
> > on 1.4, but provide an optional layer on top which leverages 1.5 things for
> > those who actually do have a 1.5 runtime environment.  That's the approach
> > taken by the "Tiger Extensions" to Shale[1].  And, the first two features of
> > these extensions (use annotations instead of configuration files, and use
> > annotations instead of implementing interfaces) are *very* similar to the
> > sorts of things that would make 1.5 attractive in [action2].
>
> I don't think this is an either/or decision.  Moving to Java 5 goes much 
> farther than simply supporting annotations.
> For example, we could fully use generics or enums, even in method signatures, 
> yet through Retroweaver, the Java 1.4
> version wouldn't be affected.
>
> Any features that _require_ annotations will be implemented as an optional 
> layer, with again, the XML as the default.
> I'm not saying we guarantee identical functionality for Java 1.4 users, but I 
> think we should be striving for Java 5
> users as our primary target.
>
> Don
>
> >
> > Don
> >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > [1] http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/features-tiger-extensions.html
> >
> > Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> >>> This looks quite nice. I cannot figure out what means support for
> >>> annotations. Even if they are left inside the classbytecode, you will
> >>> not have access to the API to use them (except the case they are
> >>> weaving the Class.class, but I really don't think so).
> >>>
> >>> ./alex
> >>> --
> >>> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 4/24/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>> There has been a lot of discussion on Java 5 support for Struts Action
> >> 2, and from my reading of the comments, we have
> >>>> settled on a path, but I want to formalize it in a vote to ensure we
> >> are all on the same page.
> >>>> I vote we develop Struts Action 2 with Java 5, taking advantage of it
> >> where ever we can.  At the same time, we should
> >>>> use Retroweaver to build jars that will run in a 1.4 JVM.  For those
> >> that aren't familiar, Retroweaver supports
> >>>> conversion of an impressive amount of Java 5 features and language
> >> changes.  In summary, Retroweaver supports [1]:
> >>>>      * generics
> >>>>      * extended for loops
> >>>>      * static imports
> >>>>      * autoboxing/unboxing
> >>>>      * varargs
> >>>>      * enumerations
> >>>>      * annotations
> >>>>
> >>>> Therefore, our development philosophy will be to take _full_ advantage
> >> of Java 5, but provide a working jar for Java
> >>>> 1.4, however, we can't guarantee every Struts Action 2.0 feature will
> >> be available to Java 1.4 users.
> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> [ ] +1 Make Java 5 the target
> >>>> [ ] +0 I am fine with this move, but I'll still mainly interested in
> >> 1.4
> >>>> [ ] -0 I am not too keen, because ...
> >>>> [ ] -1 I am against this move, because ...
> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll tally the votes after at least 72 hours and include the count in
> >> our STATUS file.  The vote is open to anyone.
> >>>> Don
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] http://retroweaver.sourceforge.net/documentation.html
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to