Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification.
The following page has been changed by Eric Molitor: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. [molitor] Modular Ant Build, I've started working on this using the build files that Jason supplied (which were forwarded on to me). Allows the project to build in whole or in part with seperate build files that extend a set of common/parent build files. Should parallel the maven build. * [tm_jee] +1 Jason's Ant Build is impressive, I'll need some time to get familiar with Maven and would like to keep an alternate optiona available. :-) + 1. [molitor] Ability to use values on the stack to override/define configuration options. My patch for the StreamResult is just one application of this, there are many others. + + 1. [molitor] Ability to invoke an action without an execute method. If I annotate a class with @assume_success (or something like @assumed result=SUCCESS) I shouldn't need an execute method. In XML this could be achieved something like this.{{{<action name="addPerson" class="com.opensymphony.webwork.showcase.person.AddPerson" assumeResult="success"> + <result>showPerson.jsp</result> + <result name="input">addPerson.jsp</result> + </action>}}}The ValidationInterceptor should still cause an input result to occur but if we make it through to invoking the action and there is no execute method we return the value of the configured assumed result. + == What JDK Version? == * [jcarreira] We've been using JDK 1.5 on Tomcat 5+ for over a year... Everything we write and wire together is using generics and annotations. @@ -442, +449 @@ * [crazybob] You're right. That's actually been my experience, too. I'm fine with supporting 1.4 (though I'd prefer not to have to write the code as I haven't used it for some time). * [rainerh] +1 for Java 5 support * [tm_jee] +1 + * [molitor] +1 for JDK 1.5+ * [niallp] +1 for JDK 1.5 (btw I did a [http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-user/200601.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] POLL on what jdk people used] in Jan). Although it will prevent some users upgrading, maybe for others it will be part of the ''tipping point'' to encourage them to move to 1.5. Also what will the JDK landscape look +1 year from now - I believe most users take their time before upgrading, so thats probably a realistic timescale for the vast majority to consider SAF2. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
