On 4/29/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The proposal to establish [EMAIL PROTECTED] resulted in 10 +1 votes (four from PMC members: James, Greg, Craig, Wendy) 2 +0 votes (Don and Ted) The proposal to unsubscribe commits@ from dev@ resulted in 11 +1 votes (five from PMC members James, Greg, Craig, Ted, Wendy) 1 +0 vote (Don) (Counting my implied +1 since it looks like I didn't vote. :) And I'm not exactly sure how to count the votes... the voting page [1] wasn't much help for proposals.)
That's because this was *not* a vote. It was a proposal. The +1's, +0s, etc. do not count as votes but as expressions of agreement or otherwise. That there were no -1 or -0 comments indicates that there was general concensus to go ahead. In general, we need to get better at not throwing +1s, etc., around all the time as if they were votes, because clearly it can cause some confusion when they're not. ;-) And I admit I'm just as guilty of this as anyone else. -- Martin Cooper I'll go ahead and ask infrastructure to establish the new
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list with archives, and to make sure that commits@ will be archived before we unsub it from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I assume a moderator for dev@ can do that part.) [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Thanks, Wendy On 4/25/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To make it easier to filter and sort messages, and to facilitate > presenting the lists through alternate interfaces such as forums and > RSS feeds, I propose that we do the following: > > * establish [EMAIL PROTECTED] and direct JIRA emails to it > > * unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] (svn commit messages and Wiki diffs) from dev@ > > Initially, the subscriber lists for these two could be copied from > dev@, so that current subscribers are not affected. (Except for > possibly needing to reconfigure mail filters.) > > Thanks, > -- > Wendy > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]