I'm cool with that. Sticking with verbs, there's also err(), warn(), inform(). ;)
Bob On 5/5/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, I generally like it, but I still prefer the more obvious addError(), addWarning(). I like my methods as verbs... makes reading the code easier (to me). > - The attached version supports arbitrary levels. I > used an interface > instead of an enum so the user can define additional > levels if they > wish. Should Level extend Comparable? > > - It has built in support for INFO, WARN, and ERROR > along with > respective convenience methods. > > - It provides a Map of field messages. It's not > necessary for Messages > itself to implement both Map and List. Delegating to > separate objects > is less confusing. > > - Adding messages and checking for the presence of > messages > (hasErrors()) should be dead simple. Getting the > messages doesn't have > to be as convenient (at least not through the > published API). > > - "Request-scoped" is the wrong word. We're really > talking about "not > associated with a field." Page-scoped? Form-scoped? > Global? > > Thanks, > Bob > ------------------------------------------------------ > --------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=29554&messageID=57361#57361 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
