Wendy, +1 on picking apart my argument :) Thanks for clearing things up for me; I apologize for missing the obvious fact that this isn't Standalone Tiles. I got lost in my philosophy! Thanks again :)
--- Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/14/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Listen to this logic: By making branding Tiles a 1.3.x version, > > we are directly tying the product to struts. That implies it > > is only for Struts, and that's not true. > > Struts Tiles *is* tied directly to Struts Action -- look at the > dependency in action/tiles/pom.xml. > > This is not Standalone Tiles we're talking about. That's in the > sandbox and doesn't depend on Struts. > > > I am just bringing it up because we have very much > > aligned Tiles to Struts with upgrading the Tiles DTD, and when > > Struts 1.4 comes out, I expect Tiles 1.4 DTD too. > > Yes. But then, I always thought it was strange that there was no Tiles 1.2 > DTD. > > And yes, this means that once a Struts Action 1.3 release is voted GA, > that DTD, along with all the others, the TLDs and the public API, is > set. > > A proposal (or at least a poll) might be in order to see whether we > want to keep the Tiles 1.3 DTD or just have 1.1 since it has not > changed. > > -- > Wendy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
