>From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> More updated status on shale-clay:
>
> On 6/3/06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> >
> > However, the following modules still have unit test failures:
> >
> > * shale-clay: It looks like the component definitions for the standard
> > JSF components
> > are not getting recognized. Gary, could you take a look at these?
> >
>
> There were some more resources fixes that needed to get added to the runtime
> JAR. That fixed everything except to assertion failures in
> ClayAmalgamTestCase, which I have temporarily commented out with FIXME
> notes. These will need to be reviewed more carefully by Gary. But, with
> these two assertions commented out, the Mavenized version of shale-clay
> passes all its unit tests.
>
I'll take a look at these too.
> By the way, Gary, I think you might have the order of arguments incorrect on
> your assert calls. It should be assertEquals("label", "expected value",
> "actual value") but it looks like the latter two are reversed, at least in
> these two tests. The order doesn't affect whether the test will pass or
> fail, but it does make the resulting exception message more difficult to
> understand.
>
I recently saw that one myself. I noticed that on my last commit and started
swapping the argument order. I think I might have several tests that I made
this mistake on.
> Craig
Gary
