I think everyone knows by now that this brevity is bad programming?
On 6/30/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ted Husted wrote: > > Though, there's no reason why we couldn't use > > > >> repos/asf/struts/struts1 > >> repos/asf/struts/struts2 > > > > Or > > > >> repos/asf/struts/framework > >> repos/asf/struts/framework2 > > I like struts1/struts2. Or, in the interest of brevity, even repos/asf/struts/s1 repos/asf/struts/s2 -T. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
