Question on this and the overall philosophy that is the goal for Struts 2. Why
is it necessary to have a struts dtd rather than simply use the xwork dtd and
then simply add the feature that allows the name to be changed from xwork.xml
to struts.xml?
Is the goal still to keep XWork functionality out of Struts 2 or has it been
resolved to create an abstraction layer around XWork so Struts 2 users don't
use XWork directly at all?
Thanks,
Gabe
----- Original Message ----
From: Don Brown (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: issues@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 1:21:16 AM
Subject: [jira] Resolved: (WW-1376) Struts configuration files should be named
struts.xml, not xwork.xml
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376?page=all ]
Don Brown resolved WW-1376:
---------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed, so now Struts has struts.xml with its own DTD
> Struts configuration files should be named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-1376
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376
> Project: Struts 2
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Reporter: Don Brown
> Assignee: Don Brown
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> As part of the renaming and WW cleanup process, I think Struts should have
> its own configuration DTD, so users would use it and not the XWork one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
