Use "action-id" then. The point is that moniker "alias" is going to cause confusion, since it already means something entirely different within the Struts 2 community. Struts 2 does *not* have a logical name for Actions. The "name" attribute is the exact equivalent of the "path" attribute in Struts 1. If this idiom proves useful for Struts 1, we may want to bring it forward to Struts 2, and so it's important to use terminology that won't confuse the Struts 2 community.
-Ted. On 8/23/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Use the moniker "action-ref" instead of "alias" On the action mapping? <action action-ref>? or are you talking about the forward? If it is no the action, I do not think that jives with the current usage of -ref in the field. In Spring, it references something already defined; it does not define something. Paul
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
