Right, in that context including an action as a block is very much like
including a tile with an associated tile controller.  The action then
just puts data into scope for the JSP to display.

What I didn't understand was, "It can also decide the flow of display by
selecting the appropriate forward."

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Jouravlev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:04 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Private Actions Mappings?
> 
> 
> This topic NOT about chaining (Paul, I am very sorry to bring 
> the chaining up).
> 
> What Paul talks about is including an action URL into a JSP 
> page. Consider a Model 1 application, JSP page can 
> dynamically include other resources with <jsp:include> or 
> with <c:import>. Now consider that a JSP page includes a 
> Struts action instead of JSP file. Included Struts action 
> forwards to a JSP file, the latter renders a fragment of a 
> composite page. There is no disagreement.
> 
> On 9/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you're chaining actions for different blocks of the 
> display, how do 
> > you handle disagreements between the appropriate forward of 
> one block 
> > vs. another?  This seems problematic, to me.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Paul Benedict [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On Behalf 
> > > Of Paul Benedict
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:07 PM
> > > To: Dinwiddie, George
> > > Cc: dev@struts.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Private Actions Mappings?
> > >
> > >
> > > By performing an "action", it is getting data from a 
> service. It can 
> > > also decide the flow of display by selecting the appropriate 
> > > forward.
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Coming in very late, here, but I just wanted clarification.
> > >  It sounds
> > > > to me as if you're using actions like a tile 
> controller.  In other 
> > > > words, it's not performing any "action" or deciding the flow of 
> > > > display, but merely gathering data and putting it into 
> scope for 
> > > > display.  Is that a correct description?
> > > >
> > > >  - George
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to