> Its doable I guess. > > If we have an Expression parser / converter like Alex > pointed out, we could have a standard syntax, but it > would be more complicated to implement. > > Without an Expression parser / converter, it'd likely > to get users confused as it depends on what > implementation is being used. > > Either case, I think we should stick with a standard > supported implementation i guess. Personally, I think > that Ognl is still the most powerfull expression > language. :-) > > Btw, is Ognl so slow? I think there's some caching > done to the expression evaluation, is that not > sufficient to make the performance acceptable as > well? > > rgds >
Yeah, I don't think the goal of this effort should be to have the ability to plug in whichever EL you want for a particular project. Too confusing. The goal should be to make it easy to plug in the EL that's going to be a JSR standard coming out of the JSP / JSF EL. They've been listening to suggestions for things like projections and method calling, so it should be a powerful enough EL. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=44645&messageID=90553#90553 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
