Musachy, David is correct. org.apache.struts2.showcase.ajax.AutocompleterExampleAction is missing in showcase. Could you please add it to the issue.
tia, Rainer > I'm getting the following when I start up the showcase in the trunk. I > took a look at the patch, and it doesn't seem to include the > AutocompleterExampleAction. Any ideas? > > David > > > [ERROR] ] - Exception starting filter struts <Action class > [org.apache.struts2.showcase.ajax.AutocompleterExampleAction] not found > - action - > file:/projects/open-source/struts2/apps/showcase/target/struts2-showcase/WEB-INF/classes/struts-ajax.xml:74:112>Action > class [org.apache.struts2.showcase.ajax.AutocompleterExampleAction] not > found - action - > file:/projects/open-source/struts2/apps/showcase/target/struts2-showcase/WEB-INF/classes/struts-ajax.xml:74:112 > at > com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.providers.XmlConfigurationProvider.verifyAction(XmlConfigurationProvider.java:337) > at > com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.providers.XmlConfigurationProvider.addAction(XmlConfigurationProvider.java:291) > at > com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.providers.XmlConfigurationProvider.addPackage(XmlConfigurationProvider.java:378) > at > com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.providers.XmlConfigurationProvider.loadPackages(XmlConfigurationProvider.java:242) > at > org.apache.struts2.config.StrutsXmlConfigurationProvider.loadPackages(StrutsXmlConfigurationProvider.java:111) > at > com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.impl.DefaultConfiguration.reload(DefaultConfiguration.java:146) > at > com.opensymphony.xwork2.config.ConfigurationManager.getConfiguration(ConfigurationManager.java:52) > > Musachy Barroso wrote: >> Oh, I get it now. Is it Friday already ? :) >> >> I have attached the patch for the autocompleter to WW-1529. >> >> musachy >> >> Martin Cooper wrote: >>> On 11/30/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Where do you think we should put it? a tag? >>> >>> >>> No, no. That would be worse. The generic serialisation code should be >>> in >>> some utility class somewhere, so that it can be used from wherever >>> might be >>> appropriate. A result implementation would be the first place that it >>> would >>> be used, but it may well be used in other places later (including >>> application code). >>> >>> I have no idea. There are >>>> also some comments that Don added that we should check out. >>> >>> >>> Yes. I haven't had the time to read through the whole JIRA thing yet, >>> though. >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Cooper >>> >>> >>> "I think this has promise. First, I'd like to see the incoming >>>> parameters better integrated into the ActionContext. In particular, >>>> the >>>> parameters should populate the parameters map in the ActionContext, >>>> and >>>> OGNL should be used for the Action population rather than by custom >>>> means. >>>> >>>> Also, it would be interesting to make the result selection happen >>>> outside the Action somehow. For example, say you had an Action that >>>> returned HTML. It would be interesting to somehow call that Action via >>>> Ajax but get JSON back instead, without the Action having to return a >>>> different result code. " >>>> >>>> Rainer, I'm going to submit my patch for the autocompleter the way it >>>> is >>>> now, and when we get this done, (if we do) then I will modify the >>>> example, sounds good? >>>> >>>> regards >>>> musachy >>>> >>>> Martin Cooper wrote: >>>> > On 11/30/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Yeah, they are not tied to ajax at all, so they shouldn't have >>>> "ajax" >>>> in >>>> >> the name if that is what you mean, but are you against having a >>>> JSON >>>> >> result type that will take care of the serialization for you? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Yes, I was cringing at the naming with AJAX in there. No, I'm not >>>> against >>>> > having a JSON result type, but the serialisation code itself should >>>> > not be >>>> > buried in there, because people might want to use that for something >>>> > else ( >>>> > e.g. embedding some JSON output within generated HTML). >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Martin Cooper >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > regards >>>> >> musachy >>>> >> >>>> >> Martin Cooper wrote: >>>> >> > On 11/30/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Musachy and others, >>>> >> >> sounds like we should finally add an AJAXResult... >>>> >> >> There have been efforts to create an AjaxJSON and AjaxXML result >>>> type >>>> >> >> already. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Please, please decouple the notion of rendering / serialising to >>>> JSON >>>> >> and >>>> >> > XML from "AJAX". They are completely unrelated. Both JSON and >>>> XML are >>>> >> > used >>>> >> > much more widely than in just AJAX scenarios now. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Also, note that there are lots of JSON serialisers out there. See >>>> >> > http://json.org/ for a list. The json.org one is also public >>>> domain. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -- >>>> >> > Martin Cooper >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > So may be we should add this to the core of Struts2 now. >>>> >> >> Have a look at http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1330 >>>> for >>>> >> more >>>> >> >> details. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> What do you think? >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> -Rainer >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> > I was finishing the autocompleter examples tonight (annoying >>>> patch >>>> >> >> coming >>>> >> >> > soon:) ) and I have a couple of questions. The autocompleter >>>> when >>>> >> used >>>> >> >> in >>>> >> >> > the "ajax" theme needs the action to return a JSON name/value >>>> list, >>>> >> >> should >>>> >> >> > we provide any easy way to generate the response from the >>>> >> action? In >>>> >> >> > showcase I'm using a freemaker template as an example, but >>>> that's >>>> >> >> going >>>> >> >> to >>>> >> >> > be a repetitive task for anyone using it. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > The second question is a beginners question, if I'm writing an >>>> >> action >>>> >> >> that >>>> >> >> > is going to be used on an ajax request, and I want to write my >>>> >> >> response >>>> >> >> > straight to the outputstream, I still need to return an string >>>> from >>>> >> >> > execute, >>>> >> >> > and I get an error on the server log stating that there is no >>>> >> "result" >>>> >> >> > configured, what is the right way of doing this? >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > regards >>>> >> >> > musachy >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > -- >>>> >> >> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
