I don't mind breaking backward compatability for the date/time picker tags, so long as we document the changes.
Along the lines of what Don mentioned, my own preference would be to create a struts-dojo plugin that separated the AJAX code from the core. I just don't know whether that would work, and whether anyone has the time and energy to make it happen. In the meantime, if we can make the Dojo date/time pickers work, albeit differently,and we can document the syntax change, then I would favor doing it now, so that we can stabalize the build. -Ted. On 12/27/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, the date/time picker. The main difference is that WW did the date formatting, now we are just passing the value straight to Dojo, who uses RFC 3339 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3339.html) musachy Ted Husted wrote: > Are we just talking about the Ajax date/time picker? > > Ian, who did a lot of the original WW coding, seemed to think that the > Ajax tags were not widely used yet. If we were going to break with the > WW Ajax tags, this would be a good time. The key question is whether > we can document the differences. > > -Ted. > > On 12/27/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The problem with the datepicker is worst than I thought, Dojo's >> DatePicker and TimePicker are way different that the ones that WW had. >> In order too keep it backward compatible, the best thing we can do is >> resurrect the "DatePicker.js" and "TimePicker.js" from WW, instead of >> using Dojo directly, like we do now. I will start to dig back and get >> the old files. >> >> musachy >> >> >> Ted Husted wrote: >> > OK, it's in r490569 >> > >> > Any feedback on WW-1573 - Handling of If-Modified-Since header for >> > static content >> > >> > Should we apply that too? >> > >> > -Ted. >> > >> > On 12/27/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> When you apply the one for the autocompleter; I will create one for >> >> datepicker against head svn, and we'll just ignore the old one. >> >> >> >> regards >> >> musachy >> >> >> >> Ted Husted wrote: >> >> > I tried to apply the patch, but there were a great many conflicts, >> >> > perhaps because of other changes. I'm happy to apply as many >> patches >> >> > as we need to bring the Ajax theme up to speed, but I don't know >> dojo >> >> > well enough to resolve conflucts with overlapping changes. >> >> > >> >> > -Ted. >> >> > >> >> > On 12/27/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> It seems like the patch for reverting the datepicker to its old >> >> name was >> >> >> never applied. >> (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1555) Does >> >> >> any one know what is the status of this one? >> >> >> >> >> >> regards >> >> >> musachy >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- HTH, Ted. * http://www.husted.com/struts/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
