They needed the <s:head> tag, and the date picker needed to have its
default date format parsing pattern changed to the RFC 3399 one.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
I brought the example pages over, but they do not seem to work now.
-Ted.
On 1/7/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, because I removed the tags they were showcasing - the datepicker
and timepicker. Those two tags didn't have unit tests, were broken, and
missing pieces. I think we only need one date/time picking tag, and one
that most closely mirrors what WebWork 2 had is the best choice. The
remaining tag, datetimepicker, does what we need and is showcased in the
ui tags, a better place than the ajax pages since it has nothing to do
with ajax.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
> Did we mean to remove the Showcase pages for the Datepicker and
> Timepicker.
>
> The pages for dropdowndatepicker and dropdowntimepicker seem to have
> been deleted, but I don't see replacements.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 1/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: mrdon
>> Date: Sun Jan 7 14:26:23 2007
>> New Revision: 493867
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493867
>> Log:
>> Renamed DropDownDateTimePicker to DateTimePicker and got rid of
>> DatePicker and
>> TimePicker, better aligning Struts 2 with WebWork 2 offerings.
>> WW-1596
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
