Joe Germuska wrote:
Sorry, I suppose that was kind of hasty of me.
I urged you to do it too. . .the great thing about source control is
that we can always roll back :)
But I have to say that I
totally disagree that the behavior of the tiles:attribute tag as it is
written is defining anything. It is causing content to appear in the page,
and therefore should have a name like insertXXX
Agree. I don't think most people will understand conceptually the
theoretical difference between rendering and attribute vs. rendering a
def/template. I think anything that renders/inserts, should be named that.
I think there was some kind of mistake, because the Javadoc was at odds
with
the code -- it didn't describe what was actually happening, as discussed
above in this thread.
I think we should have more discussion before reverting anything, because I
feel pretty strongly about naming, and I feel like what is there now is
substantially more clear than what was there before.
Agree.
But I do apologize for my haste.
Joe
On 1/12/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David H. DeWolf ha scritto:
> 2) rename tiles:put to tiles:putAttribute
I don't know, if you rename <tiles:put> you should rename also the <put>
element in the Tiles configuration file, they should be the same.
Antonio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
