Update: the corresponding S2 issue [1] should be fixed now too (crosscheck
highly appreciated). This introduced the need to update XW dependencies to
2.0.2-SNAPSHOT. I've talked with Rainer about the release schedule for XW
- if everything works as planned, this weekend a release can be expected.

Nevertheless, I seeing another issue now: In Tomcat 5.5.20, a given S2 app
refuses to serialize because of ContainerImpl$ConstructorInjector not
being serializable (and probably won't ever be...). This issue seems to
not have been introduced by the TextProvider stuff (afaics). I suspect
that a ref to the container is held where it is not indicated to do so.
Can someone confirm this issue?

At last, for the protocol, my vote for 2.0.7
>    [x] Leave at test build
>    [ ] Alpha
>    [ ] Beta
>    [ ] General Availability (GA)

- Rene

[1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1856

Am Mi, 28.03.2007, 01:18, schrieb Rene Gielen:
> I should have fixed the according XWork issue [1] for XW 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT.
>    To fix WW-1856, we have to upgrade XWork dependency.
>
> Unfortunately, the conditions under which this issue shows up are far
> from rare. Any use of the i18n tag is likely to cause troubles. I can
> reproduce various cases where a simple POST with an Action.execute()
> target produces unreadable pages due to inproper text resolving.
>
> Therefore I would consider this issue as blocker for making 2.0.7 a GA
> release. Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> - Rene
>
> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>
> Rene Gielen schrieb:
>> I seem to have the same issue here in a customer project, but since it
>> is portlet environment, I was not sure yet whether it was a porlet
>> related issue...
>>
>> - Rene
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST), "Rainer Hermanns"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> James,
>>>
>>> there is a blocking error for xwork 2.0.2 [1] that seems to be related.
>>> I am trying to work on this the coming weekend and release xw 2.0.2
>>> ASAP with this and other fixes.
>>>
>>> +1 for beta
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Rainer
>>>
>>> [1] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-487
>>>
>>>> In trying to fix a few insignificant items in the the mailreader, and
>>>> I'm seeing some weirdness in the i18n tag....by weirdness, I mean
>>>> that it's broke.
>>>>
>>>> Can someone confirm?
>>>>
>>>> If so, my vote goes to +1 for beta.
>>>>
>>>>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to