Just to follow up on this, everything is in trunk. This is how it works:
Actions with the "jsonValidation" interceptor applied, will return something
like:
/* {
"errors": ["Action error"],
"fieldErrors": {
"name": ["Name is required", "Something else"]
}
} */
if validation fails. If validation succeeds, action will return regular
output. If the there is a request parameter, "validateOnly" the action won't
be executed, even if validation succeeds, in which case this will be
returned:
/* {} */
The interceptor has a "validationFailedStatus" which will be used as the
request status, if validation fails (not used by default).
The submit, anchor, and bind tags have a new attribute "ajaxAfterValidation"
(false by default), which if set to true, an ajax request will be made, if
validation succeeds. So now if you are using the ajaxtags to make ajax
requests, ajax validation can be used by setting this attribute to true.
The ajax validation example in showcase is updated with 2 examples, one
using regular submit after validation and another using ajax request after
validation. Feedback is appreciated :)
musachy
//is there anyway I can update the docs(wiki) without affecting
2.0.8documentation?
On 4/23/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That would be the function I mentioned before. With that in mind, I think
it would be better to have the interceptor and the generic function in core,
so it can be used with other js libraries. I was going to put it in the Dojo
plugin as we are moving all the ajax stuff there, but it isn't specific to
Dojo in any way.
musachy
On 4/23/07, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Excellent. Well, then really all that is lacking is a generic JS script
> to handle the response and add errors to the form/labels/some div. It
> would be excellent to have a JS plugin model where developers can select
> the JS framework they want to use and then they can plugin to the Struts
> handling via a little bit of JS glue.
>
> -bp
>
>
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > Thanks for the code. Mine is very similar with some JSON encoding
> > added. The
> > resulting JSON is a little bit different:
> >
> > /*
> > {
> > "errors": [
> > "Error0", "Error1"
> > ],
> > "fieldErrors": {
> > "field1" : ["Error0", "Error1"],
> > "field2": ["Error0", "Error1"],
> > }
> > }
> > */
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On 4/23/07, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've also done this exercise twice in the past and both times I used
> >> other JS libraries including prototype. My first solution was
> >> specifically for WebWork and I don't recall any changes I had to make
> >> when moving it over to Struts2.
> >>
> >> Perhaps it makes sense to ensure that this will be completely
> pluggable
> >> since many folks are using other JS libraries. My solution only
> requires
> >> a form post that is the same or a partial version of the post that
> would
> >> normally be submitted. This allows me to use pretty much any library
> >> that can handle form submission.
> >>
> >> I've included my latest interceptor for you guys to look over. Let me
> >> know what you think. I was planning on making a Struts2 plugin that
> had
> >> this and the necessary JavaScript files and template to work with
> >> Prototype once I had finished it off. But if you are heading in that
> >> direction, we should collaborate on it.
> >>
> >> -bp
> >>
> >>
> >> Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >> > This would be for 2.1, and it would be in Bind.js. It is actually
> only
> >> > one
> >> > function, which will be calling the functions in
> >> > validation.js(addError/clearErrors...). I'm planning to do some
> >> > cleanup after that as we
> >> > have some javascript/css files hanging around, which are not used.
> >> >
> >> > musachy
> >> >
> >> > On 4/23/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Is the Ajax code all in a module now ( 2.1.x)? Would this change
> be
> >> >> checked into the 2.0.x branch or just the trunk under the Ajax
> >> module,
> >> >> and then some cleanup/removal of existing code in the trunk?
> >> >>
> >> >> /Ian
> >> >>
> >> >> Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >> >> > I have this working, but I want to give it a little more time
> to
> >> >> > anyone to
> >> >> > object before committing it :), just to review, these are the
> >> >> different
> >> >> > validation options:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 1. regular form, regular submit button (normal validation)
> >> >> > 2. css_html form, or xhtml form (validate="true"), regular
> submit
> >> >> button
> >> >> > (client validation)
> >> >> > 3. css_html form, or xhtml form (validate="true"), ajax submit
> >> button
> >> >> > (client validation)
> >> >> > 4. regular form, css_html form, or xhtml form, where action has
> the
> >> >> > "ajaxValidation" interceptor, ajax submit button
> (validate="true")
> >> >> (ajax
> >> >> > validation = dojo+interceptor, no DWR)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > regards
> >> >> > musachy
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 4/21/07, Musachy Barroso < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I'd like to propose a change on the way we do ajax validation.
> >> >> >> Instead of
> >> >> >> using DWR which requires an external dependency and configuring
> a
> >> >> >> servlet,
> >> >> >> I'd like to have an interceptor in the dojo plugin that extends
>
> >> the
> >> >> >> validator interceptor, which outputs JSON with the messages
> when
> >> >> >> there are
> >> >> >> validation errors.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> To use ajax validation all a user would have to do is add the
> >> >> >> interceptor
> >> >> >> to his/her class and set "validate" to "true" in either the
> >> form, or
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> submit/anchor that is submitting the form.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> regards
> >> >> >> musachy
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
