Would anyone find it valuable to remove either Resolved or Closed? Is that even possible? I don't object to getting rid of one. What do you think Don and Antonio?
On 8/9/07, Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:32:43PM +1000, Don Brown wrote: > > I believe the traditional purpose of the "closed" state is for a QA > > department, so they can mark the issues they have verified to be > > fixed. In Struts, I don't think we really do that, and while we do > > informal code reviews (commit emails), we certainly don't require > > formal test documents that verify the ticket resolution is correct. > > If a release manager wants to take that role upon themselves, that's > > great, but it should be purely optional. > > I've rejigged JIRA to allow Closed issues to be edited, since that's been > confusing/annoying a few people: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1303 > > (at least they will be on the next JIRA restart) > > Let me know if the Struts devs prefer to keep Closed issues uneditable. > > > --Jeff > > > Don > ... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
