I am also using 2.1 and it is working great for me.
On Wed Aug 22 14:18 , 'Musachy Barroso' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >I'm using 2.1 on development, and it is working fine so far. > >musachy > >On 8/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 8/22/07, Rene Gielen [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > 2.1 is not a simple drop in replacement for 2.0.x AFAICS. I would expect a >> > (hopefully short time) where the 2.0.x tree still might need maintainance, >> >> True, but we now have both 2.0.10 and 2.0.11 on the roadmap. We should >> also take a critical look at any ticket on the 2.0.10 and 2.0.11 >> roadmaps and consider whether it is a "maintenance" issue or not. >> Several issues were simply put under 2.0.x by default and might not be >> considered "maintenance" issues in light of an active 2.1.x series. >> >> >> > For the testing of a 2.1 release, I'll be happy to test some of the said >> > customer projects against it. >> >> If you could try that against the head in a development environment, >> it might give us a heads-up before the roll. I'll do the same in a >> new application I'm about to start. >> >> -Ted. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > >-- >"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
