On Nov 13, 2007 1:16 AM, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you actually meant "assembly" plugin, then I am addressing that problem > too: in fact I wanted to update it, but I could not do it since, after > updating, the source assembly does not get built (it seems like a bug in > assembly plugin, but I cannot swear it...). > If we remove the libs (and then the "build.xml") I think that we can have a > lighter and cleaner source distribution. > Do we really *want* to provide an ANT build.xml?
Yes, I meant assembly plugin. I've lost track of it, but it seems that the new one is not compatible with our assembly descriptors, or it needs different configuration. The one we're using works, it just takes more xml than it should to construct the source distribution. (Naming every directory rather than having it recursively get all the modules and sub-modules.) Sounds like you're working on it, so I'll leave it unless you have questions... -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
