Your suggestion for question 1 is good, since we have more description on struts documentation.
The 2 point is the most important, from my view. Use JSP EL in Struts2 tag is not a best pratice. Match these kind of languages could make the code confuse to be maintained. Sometimes you use OGNL, othertimes you use JSTL EL. We can make this stop now, buy forcing people to use OGNL or leave it possible to use and keep trying to make them understand that it is a bad pratice. I think lot of people can say that match it is not a bad pratice, but... well, somebody have to decide it. Grato, Felipe Rodrigues Bob Tiernay wrote: > > > 1. can be addressed by tld/tag description elements in the tld that show > up in modern IDEs. > > Is 2. really a problem? Sorry, I didn't really understand. > > Bob > >> Bob, >> >> I see 2 problems. >> First, there should be a very clear explanation about this >> "struts-dangerous", telling the risk of use JSTL in struts tags. Also, I >> think the static calls by OGNL should be disabled, and maybe it >> represents a >> refactor anyway. The good point is that you can enable static access in >> struts.properties. >> >> The second problem is keep feeding this pratice (use JSTL EL). >> >> But I have to say that having this package is would avoid a lot of >> explanation in old struts2 apps. >> >> Felipe >> >> >> Bob Tiernay wrote: >>> >>> >>> I also recall an email sent on this prior, where a decussion about 2 >>> tlds >>> was brewing. Whatever happened with that? >>> >>> With each new struts release, I need to extract the tld and update it. >>> Now, it's not so bad if it's just little old me, but what about everyone >>> else who has to do the same? Seems like a lot of wasted time and effort >>> if you as me. >>> >>> If adding a jstl enabled tld is because it's "dangerous" with ognl >>> expression use, then make the uri: "struts-dangerous"! If it's because >>> there is a process issue, lets discuss :) >>> >>> Bob >>> >>>> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:42:28 -0800 >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> To: dev@struts.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: Issue WW-2107 question - Is JSTL disable or not? >>>> >>>> >>>> Well, >>>> >>>> It is a question about a Jira Issue. That`s why I asked in the >>>> developers >>>> maillist. >>>> >>>> By the way, thanks for the answer. >>>> >>>> >>>> Felipe >>>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Issue-WW-2107-question---Is-JSTL-disable-or-not--tp15830208p15872871.html >> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Issue-WW-2107-question---Is-JSTL-disable-or-not--tp15830208p15876129.html Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
