Also +1 for beta. On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ ] Leave at test build > > [ ] Alpha > > [X] Beta > > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > I don't think it is stable enough for a GA (and there are apparent > licensing issues I guess), but I think it is good enough to be BETA > and to get into our user's hands for more testing. Unless there are > huge legal issues or show-stopping stability problems, we need to be > getting these releases out to our community or we will never get a GA > build. Remember, beta means it is feature complete but there are > known issues, and I think that is what we have here. > > Don > > o > > > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > > list. > > > > Don > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- James Mitchell
