Do you have an implementation of this already? musachy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Musachy Barroso wrote: >> >> For those of you ignoring the spam on the Convention vote thread :). I >> mentioned that the framework should support more than one >> UnknownHandler, which would eventually make Convention and Codebehind >> compatible, as well as other plugins in the future. The bad side >> effect is that some configuration would be needed for the order of >> evaluation of the UnknownHandlers, as well as a default(first UH that >> can handle the request will be the one used). Comment away. >> >> musachy >> > > This is a large problem that I have been trying to solve for JCatapult. How > do you allow plugins to be dropped in but somehow organize themselves > correctly? The only solution I can think of is to have a configuration > parameter that is a ordered list of named beans to use. If someone is going > to be using both plugins, but will need to set this property by hand. If > they only use one, then XWork can ignore the property because there aren't > multiple UnknownHandlers in the container. > > If someone has other cool ideas that don't require configuration, let me > know! > > -bp > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
