In fact, I think the "call elements" are exactly that: http://gxp.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/docs/gxp-ref.html
musachy On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't look at it in detail, but there's got to be a way to create > new "elements" (tags), if there isn't we will hack it and send them > the code :) > > musachy > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Piero Sartini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2008 11:18:06 schrieb Ted Husted: >>> The proposal would use GXP to generate the same content as we do here, >>> so we can wrap the output as a JSP, Velocity, or Freemarker "tag". >> >> Thanks for the explanation! >> So lets go one step further - would it be possible for the user to write his >> templates in GXP instead of JSP, FreeMarker or Velocity? Since there already >> exists a result, it should not be that complicated. >> >> But how to access the wrapped s2 tags in this case? If they are written in >> GXP, they could be imported with gxp itself. But this would bypass the >> wrapper. As far as I understand it they would not be accessed in the same way >> as with the other template systems. >> >> Piero >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
