Why not make this a Maven profile?

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:25 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: rgielen
> Date: Sun Dec  7 04:25:16 2008
> New Revision: 724125
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=724125&view=rev
> Log:
> Disabled JDK backports for now to fix CI builds. To enable again, we need a 
> XWork jar backport released / distributed for Maven dependency resolution
>
> Modified:
>    struts/struts2/branches/STRUTS_2_0_X/assembly/pom.xml
>
> Modified: struts/struts2/branches/STRUTS_2_0_X/assembly/pom.xml
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/branches/STRUTS_2_0_X/assembly/pom.xml?rev=724125&r1=724124&r2=724125&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- struts/struts2/branches/STRUTS_2_0_X/assembly/pom.xml (original)
> +++ struts/struts2/branches/STRUTS_2_0_X/assembly/pom.xml Sun Dec  7 04:25:16 
> 2008
> @@ -123,7 +123,9 @@
>                     <descriptors>
>                         <descriptor>src/main/assembly/all.xml</descriptor>
>                         <descriptor>src/main/assembly/lib.xml</descriptor>
> +<!--
>                         
> <descriptor>src/main/assembly/lib-jdk14.xml</descriptor>
> +-->
>                         <descriptor>src/main/assembly/apps.xml</descriptor>
>                         <descriptor>src/main/assembly/src.xml</descriptor>
>                         <descriptor>src/main/assembly/docs.xml</descriptor>
> @@ -433,6 +435,7 @@
>
>
>         <!-- Backported JDK 1.4 jars -->
> +        <!--
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>net.sf.retrotranslator</groupId>
>             <artifactId>retrotranslator-runtime</artifactId>
> @@ -455,6 +458,7 @@
>             <classifier>jdk14</classifier>
>             <scope>runtime</scope>
>         </dependency>
> +-->
>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>org.apache.struts</groupId>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to