The Multiple Unknown Handlers patch was merged into xwork and struts
trunks. Now we can move convention plugin out of the sanbox. Last call
for objections :) (2.1 build coming soon)

musachy

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I updated the patch to use a 2.1 dtd, instead of 2.0, and removed the
> annoying empty lines from the diff. Crucible seems to have a bug, and even
> when I uncheck files from the "Patch" section, it keeps them in the review
> (take note Don :) )
>
> http://fisheye6.atlassian.com/cru/DEMO-21
>
> musachy
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:42 PM, <musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On our super long convention thread, we got to the agreement that in order
>> to move convention out of the sandbox, there should be a way to run both
>> plugins side by side, so backward compatibility could be possible. The
>> remaining issue to make that happen was to implement "multiple unknown
>> handler", for which I uploaded a new patch here (against trunk):
>>
>> http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-640
>> (http://fisheye6.atlassian.com/cru/DEMO-19)
>>
>> that creates an extension point for unknown handlers manager, instead of
>> some ugly static classes I wrote before. We also agreed to include
>> convention after 2.1 was released, but based on how long releases
>> take(hoping to change that soon), I propose that we move convention out of
>> trunk for the next 2.1 release so it will be available when 2.1 goes GA, and
>> not 1 or 2 years after that.
>>
>> @Rainer, @Rene: could you guys take a look at the new patch? That thing
>> was a pain to merge being so old, the new one should merge fine.
>>
>> regards
>> musachy
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>



-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to