Something you can allways do, is to define a parallel set of
getter/setter in your bean with type java.util.Date that internally
does the conversion.
public Date getStartDate() {
return start.toDate();
}
public void setStartDate(Date start) {
this.start = new DateTime( start) ;
}
Si quieres ser más positivo, pierde un electrón
Miguel Ruiz Velasco S.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:46, Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> wrote:
> Date is pretty much deprecated except for a way to carry a long primitive
> around because of the TZ and conversions it lacks. It fails in some cases
> and most of the core API on Date is deprecated. Most folks should be using
> Calendar for date and time correctness if they don't want to use Joda and
> stick with the JDK classes. Calendar however is very clunky and mutable.
> Therefore, most people I know that need to internationalize or localize use
> Joda because it is correct, simple and immutable. Also, something very
> similar to the Joda date/time API is probably going to be in Java 8.0 or
> something like that via JSR 310, unless it gets squashed or no one pushes it
> forward. Even still, Joda is the benchmark these days for a date/time API.
>
> -bp
>
> On Dec 16, 2008, at 3:30 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
>> <andr...@officenet.no>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday 16 December 2008 23:14:50 Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't mean that it will convert from string to a joda object, it
>>>> means that it will convert a string in ISO 8601 format, to a Date
>>>> object. The patch in that ticket used joda lib to create the ISO 8601,
>>>> if I don't remember wrong.
>>>
>>> Ok, so you're saying that Struts2 (even in trunk) is unable to handle
>>> joda-time dates out of the box? That's a pitty. In 2008, is anyone
>>> actually
>>> using pure java.util.Date anymore?
>>
>>
>> I was wondering the opposite - are enough people using Joda Time to make
>> it
>> worth the support / time / energy in S2? Everyone I know is, in fact,
>> using
>> java.util.Date.
>>
>> --
>> Martin Cooper
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Previously I've created container-objects to wrap joda-classes, which
>>> works
>>> but shouldn't be necessary. I kind of hoped that Struts-2 in its most
>>> modern
>>> form (trunk) included converters for the most common object-types. I
>>> think,
>>> for what it's worth, the ticket is missleading and that it should be
>>> commented somewhere that Struts-2.1 will not support joda-time.
>>>
>>> I know this sounds kind of rant-ish, but there are so many good things
>>> about Struts2 that missing out-of-the-box joda-support is kind of hard to
>>> swallow...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andreas Joseph Krogh <andr...@officenet.no>
>>> Senior Software Developer / CEO
>>> ------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
>>> OfficeNet AS | The most difficult thing in the world is to |
>>> Karenslyst Allé 11 | know how to do a thing and to watch |
>>> PO. Box 529 Skøyen | somebody else doing it wrong, without |
>>> 0214 Oslo | comment. |
>>> NORWAY | |
>>> Tlf: +47 24 15 38 90 | |
>>> Fax: +47 24 15 38 91 | |
>>> Mobile: +47 909 56 963 | |
>>> ------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
