Didn't we have a discussion earlier on extracting the base tags into a plugin? Is that still something to consider?
Nils-H On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote: > Neat, I'm glad to see work finally being done on the tags. What > exactly would this mean for 2.1 and 2.2? Would this be the default > template engine for the tags? Will the documentation need to be > rewritten? How do we keep the engines in sync if we keep the > freemarker and velocity engines around? Do we have any tests for > that? > > Don > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the java >> tags out of the sandbox into the core plugins bundled with the >> distribution, so they will be part of the 2.1 release. >> >> here is +1 >> >> musachy >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
