I had that question myself, it is not like we support this tool to be used by anyone else. Anyway, here is my
+1 GA musachy On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote: > Doh, make that +1 GA ... is a quality vote really required for > internal, compile-time libraries? We don't vote on the quality of POM > files, and those are more public. > > Don > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven >>> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3. >>> >>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with >>> a vote on its quality: >>> >>> [ ] Leave at test build >>> [ ] Alpha >>> [ ] Beta >>> [ ] General Availability (GA) >>> >>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC >>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least >>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. >>> >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. >>> >>> musachy >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
