2009/3/13 Wes Wannemacher <w...@wantii.com>: > On Thursday 12 March 2009 19:35:37 Musachy Barroso wrote: >> Yeah, I have to find a better way to test those dumb URLs with weird >> protocols. Is there a problem running with "pertest"?
> I don't see a problem with it, so long as we know why we're doing it. The key > seems to be in the javadocs for URL, it states - I've been thinking about setting forkMode to "pertest" and it can hide some errors (like this with URLUtilTest). If someone will do the same but with normal class (not with test), it will be discovered during application runtime (at least), not during tests. The best option, I suppose, is to set two kind of tests - which need forkMode to be set "pertest" and which don't. I don't know if it's possible to do with surefire plugin. Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
