Hello Eric, thank you for fast response.
Obinna wrote: > > What I have done is to put all of the meat of the javascript code into a > single file which is included in the sj:head and then just have a small > binding snippet code rendered with each tag which calls a binding function > in the main .js file. > I think also about this, but i dislike some thinks. 1.) When supporting all Widgets and interactions with one javascript file, this file grows really fast. 2.) This big javascript was loaded on every single page 3.) When I use the standard jQuery way, the user know it and can better find there own failures and can report better error messages 4.) For my opinion is a large javascript file harder to debug and maintain as some freemarker files Obinna wrote: > > This way, the addition to the freemarker templates is almost thoughtless > and > the you don't place the (IMO) overburdening requirement to add yet another > <footer/> tag for the developer. > You are right, and it was just an Idea. Maybe it can be optional. ----- --- web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Create-a-single-javascript-tp24935752p24937153.html Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
